Ipv6 test

IPv6 in Ukraine

These graphs show the evolution of default protocol, v6 address types, and average bandwidth in Ukraine over time.

They are generated using the data collected by the ipv6-test.com connection test page, and are updated on a monthly basis.

Overall IPv6 and v4 protocol support in Ukraine

This graph shows the evolution of IPv6 support vs IPv4 for all our connection test.

The numbers are percentages, so we can expect almost 100% of hosts supporting IPv4 with a slow growth for IPv6.

Top 25 internet service providers for IPv6 in Ukraine (Jul 2019)

	ISP	IPv6 tests count
1.	PE Freehost	4,581
2.	NetAssist	228
3.	Hurricane Electric LLC	109
4.	Triolan	72
5.	XServer network	56
6.	WildPark Co	33
7.	Private Enterprise «Law Firm «Status»	30
8.	GlobalLogic	16
9.	Ukrtelecom	14
10.	KuMIR TELECOM	14
11.	Kyivstar GSM	10
12.	PE Pashinska Oksana Vasulivna	6
13.	Lds	6
14.	Golden Fiber network	6
15.	Dnepronet Ltd.	5

IPv6 and v4 protocol support in Ukraine (unique addresses)

This graph shows the evolution of IPv6 support vs IPv4 for unique users of our connection test.

The numbers are percentages, so we can expect a slow growth towards 50% v4 / 50% v6.

Top 25 internet service providers for IPv6 in Ukraine (unique addresses, Jul 2019)

	ISP	Unique IPv6 addresses
1.	NetAssist	122
2.	PE Freehost	101
3.	Hurricane Electric LLC	68
4.	Triolan	48
5.	WildPark Co	24
6.	Private Enterprise «Law Firm «Status»	20
7.	GlobalLogic	13
8.	Kyivstar GSM	10
9.	KuMIR TELECOM	9
10.	Ukrtelecom	5
11.	PE Pashinska Oksana Vasulivna	4
12.	Lds	4
13.	XServer network	1
14.	Dnepronet Ltd.	1
15.	Golden Fiber network	1

Default browser protocol in Ukraine

This graph shows the percentage of browsers that default to IPv6 vs. IPv4 when visiting the ipv6-test connection test.

Hopefully, in the not so distant future, the v6 part will grow taller than the v4 one.

Default browser protocol in Ukraine (dual-stack users)

This graph shows the percentage of browsers that default to IPv6 vs. IPv4 for users that have both v4 and v6 connectivity.

Usually a system will default to v6 when it’s available, but in some cases with tunneled connections, v4 stays the default.

Top 25 internet service providers for IPv6 default in Ukraine (Jul 2019)

	ISP	Test count	IPv4	IPv4 %	IPv6	IPv6 %
1.	Hurricane Electric LLC	109	0.0%	109	100.0%
2.	XServer network	56	0.0%	56	100.0%
3.	Private Enterprise «Law Firm «Status»	30	0.0%	30	100.0%
4.	PE Freehost	4,581	2	0.0%	4,579	100.0%
5.	GlobalLogic	16	1	6.3%	15	93.8%
6.	NetAssist	228	27	11.8%	201	88.2%
7.	WildPark Co	33	4	12.1%	29	87.9%
8.	Triolan	72	10	13.9%	62	86.1%
9.	PE Pashinska Oksana Vasulivna	6	1	16.7%	5	83.3%
10.	KuMIR TELECOM	14	4	28.6%	10	71.4%
11.	Lds	6	4	66.7%	2	33.3%
12.	Kyivstar GSM	10	9	90.0%	1	10.0%
13.	Ukrtelecom	14	14	100.0%	0.0%
14.	Dnepronet Ltd.	5	5	100.0%	0.0%
15.	Golden Fiber network	6	6	100.0%	0.0%

IPv6 address types in Ukraine

Here you can see the evolution of address types over time, and measure usage of 6to4 and Teredo tunneled connectivity.

It should be noted that because 6rd works with native addresses, it cannot be detected here as tunneled. This is also the case with VPN based tunnels.

Downstream bandwidth in Ukraine

This graph illustrates the connection speed gap between IPv4 and IPv6, numbers represent v6 speed as percentage of v4 speed.

The lower IPv6 speeds are often caused by tunneling overhead or insufficient v6 connectivity or peering capacity at ISPs.

Top 25 internet service providers for IPv6 speed in Ukraine (Jul 2019)

	ISP	Test count	IPv6 average
1.	KuMIR TELECOM	14	100.2 Mbps
2.	WildPark Co	33	40.9 Mbps
3.	Triolan	72	35.2 Mbps
4.	Dnepronet Ltd.	5	32.1 Mbps
5.	NetAssist	228	30.8 Mbps
6.	Hurricane Electric LLC	109	22.2 Mbps
7.	GlobalLogic	16	11.2 Mbps
8.	Ukrtelecom	14	0.7 Mbps
9.	PE Pashinska Oksana Vasulivna	6	0.5 Mbps
10.	XServer network	56	0.0 Mbps
11.	PE Freehost	4,581	0.0 Mbps
12.	Private Enterprise «Law Firm «Status»	30	0.0 Mbps
13.	Kyivstar GSM	10	0.0 Mbps
14.	Lds	6	0.0 Mbps
15.	Golden Fiber network	6	0.0 Mbps

Отдельный домен или поддомен

Простейшее решение – создать альтернативный домен (или поддомен, к примеру ), на котором прописать только AAAA-запись. Сами же материалы, которые должны быть доступны только по IPv6, разместить в каталоге virtual host, соответствующем этому домену.

У этого способа есть несколько недостатков:

• Если ваш веб-сервер слушает также и на IPv4, клиенты смогут в своих файлах прописать в соответствие этому домену ваш IPv4-адрес, и таким образом получить доступ к нужному им виртуальному хосту, даже подключаясь к серверу по IPv4;
• Необходимость размещать IPv6-ресурсы на отдельном домене, а это не всегда удобно;
• Нет возможности выдать пытающимся подключиться к такому домену, но не имеющим IPv6-доступа пользователям, понятное сообщение об ошибке (к примеру: «данный сайт доступен только по IPv6, установите/настройте его по этой инструкции »). Браузер просто выдаст им своё сообщение «Адрес не найден».

Проверка клиентского адреса

Гораздо более гибкий способ заключается в проверке адреса, с которого подключился клиент. В простейшем варианте, отличать IPv6 от IPv4 можно по наличию в последнем точек. 🙂 Можно и наоборот, смотреть на наличие двоеточия в IPv6, но такой вариант менее надёжен, т.к. в зависимости от настройки, ваша ОС и сервер могут работать с т.н. IPv6-mapped IPv4-адресами, и все клиентские IPv4 будут видны вам в логах и проверках как (соотв-но двоеточие в адресе будет присутствовать всегда).

Также, при использовании этого способа lighttpd даёт возможность переопределить отображаемую клиенту страницу с сообщением об ошибке на произвольный HTML-файл.

По поводу выдаваемого кода HTTP для подключающихся по IPv4 клиентов, мне видится два варианта:

• , с собственным текстом сообщения в HTML-странице («403 No IPv4 Allowed» :).
• , среди существующих кодов ответа HTTP, этот малоизвестный код редиректа показался мне более всего подходящим для перенаправления части посетителей на страницу с информацией о том, почему им не доступен ресурс, который они пытались открыть. К сожалению, возможность переопределять код редиректа появилась только начиная с ветки lighttpd 1.5, я же пока пользуюсь 1.4, поэтому данный вариант не тестировал.

Запрет IPv4-доступа

Запрещаем IPv4-доступ к каталогу на сайте :

/var/www/error-ipv6only-403.html

html>body>
h1>403 No IPv4 Allowedh1>
p>Sorry, this is an IPv6-only resource. Please get yourself IPv6 if you want to access it.p>
body>/html>

/etc/lighttpd/lighttpd.conf

$HTTP"host" == "example.com" {
  $HTTP"url" =~ "^/goodies.*" {
    $HTTP"remoteip" =~ "\." {
      url.access-deny = ("")
      server.errorfile-prefix = "/var/www/error-ipv6only-"
    }
  }
}

Сохраняем конфиг, перезапускаем веб-сервер, и всё готово. 🙂

Проверяем:

$ curl -I4 http://example.com/goodies/
HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden


$ curl -I6 http://example.com/goodies/
HTTP/1.1 200 OK

Ограничение скорости

Помимо полного запрета доступа с IPv4, lighttpd также предоставляет нам возможность вместо этого ограничить его скорость любой величиной, начиная от 32 КБ/сек. К примеру, вместо полного запрета выставляем суммарный лимит скорости всех IPv4-соединений, загружающих файлы из каталога , в 256 КБ/сек:

/etc/lighttpd/lighttpd.conf

$HTTP"host" == "example.com" {
  $HTTP"url" =~ "^/goodies.*" {
    $HTTP"remoteip" =~ "\." {
      server.kbytes-per-second = 256
    }
  }
}

lighttpd-ipv6-only.txt · Последние изменения: 2011-07-29 08:37 UTC От rm

IPv6 in Finland

These graphs show the evolution of default protocol, v6 address types, and average bandwidth in Finland over time.

They are generated using the data collected by the ipv6-test.com connection test page, and are updated on a monthly basis.

Overall IPv6 and v4 protocol support in Finland

This graph shows the evolution of IPv6 support vs IPv4 for all our connection test.

The numbers are percentages, so we can expect almost 100% of hosts supporting IPv4 with a slow growth for IPv6.

Top 25 internet service providers for IPv6 in Finland (Jul 2019)

	ISP	IPv6 tests count
1.	DNA Oyj	476
2.	Elisa Oyj	465
3.	Creanova	172
4.	CJSC «ER-Telecom Holding» Yoshkar-Ola branch	67
5.	Hetzner Online GmbH	48
6.	Teliasonera-fi-net 6rd	33
7.	Empor Oy	33
8.	Lounea Oy	26
9.	Ficolo Oy	23
10.	Oy Multi.fi Finland Ab Ltd	15
11.	Choopa	14
12.	Funet 2001:708:10::/48	9
13.	Teliasonera	9
14.	Hurricane Electric LLC	8

IPv6 and v4 protocol support in Finland (unique addresses)

This graph shows the evolution of IPv6 support vs IPv4 for unique users of our connection test.

The numbers are percentages, so we can expect a slow growth towards 50% v4 / 50% v6.

Top 25 internet service providers for IPv6 in Finland (unique addresses, Jul 2019)

	ISP	Unique IPv6 addresses
1.	Elisa Oyj	271
2.	DNA Oyj	242
3.	CJSC «ER-Telecom Holding» Yoshkar-Ola branch	45
4.	Teliasonera-fi-net 6rd	21
5.	Ficolo Oy	17
6.	Hetzner Online GmbH	15
7.	Empor Oy	15
8.	Creanova	9
9.	Hurricane Electric LLC	8
10.	Teliasonera	7
11.	Oy Multi.fi Finland Ab Ltd	6
12.	Funet 2001:708:10::/48	2
13.	Lounea Oy	2
14.	Choopa	1

Default browser protocol in Finland

This graph shows the percentage of browsers that default to IPv6 vs. IPv4 when visiting the ipv6-test connection test.

Hopefully, in the not so distant future, the v6 part will grow taller than the v4 one.

Default browser protocol in Finland (dual-stack users)

This graph shows the percentage of browsers that default to IPv6 vs. IPv4 for users that have both v4 and v6 connectivity.

Usually a system will default to v6 when it’s available, but in some cases with tunneled connections, v4 stays the default.

Top 25 internet service providers for IPv6 default in Finland (Jul 2019)

	ISP	Test count	IPv4	IPv4 %	IPv6	IPv6 %
1.	Choopa	14	0.0%	14	100.0%
2.	Funet 2001:708:10::/48	9	0.0%	9	100.0%
3.	Lounea Oy	26	0.0%	26	100.0%
4.	Empor Oy	33	1	3.0%	32	97.0%
5.	Elisa Oyj	465	34	7.3%	431	92.7%
6.	CJSC «ER-Telecom Holding» Yoshkar-Ola branch	67	6	9.0%	61	91.0%
7.	Teliasonera-fi-net 6rd	33	4	12.1%	29	87.9%
8.	Hurricane Electric LLC	8	1	12.5%	7	87.5%
9.	Creanova	172	40	23.3%	132	76.7%
10.	DNA Oyj	476	118	24.8%	358	75.2%
11.	Hetzner Online GmbH	48	23	47.9%	25	52.1%
12.	Teliasonera	9	8	88.9%	1	11.1%
13.	Ficolo Oy	23	21	91.3%	2	8.7%
14.	Oy Multi.fi Finland Ab Ltd	15	15	100.0%	0.0%

IPv6 address types in Finland

Here you can see the evolution of address types over time, and measure usage of 6to4 and Teredo tunneled connectivity.

It should be noted that because 6rd works with native addresses, it cannot be detected here as tunneled. This is also the case with VPN based tunnels.

Downstream bandwidth in Finland

This graph illustrates the connection speed gap between IPv4 and IPv6, numbers represent v6 speed as percentage of v4 speed.

The lower IPv6 speeds are often caused by tunneling overhead or insufficient v6 connectivity or peering capacity at ISPs.

Top 25 internet service providers for IPv6 speed in Finland (Jul 2019)

	ISP	Test count	IPv6 average
1.	Hurricane Electric LLC	8	469.0 Mbps
2.	DNA Oyj	476	182.4 Mbps
3.	Funet 2001:708:10::/48	9	64.7 Mbps
4.	Teliasonera	9	58.8 Mbps
5.	Teliasonera-fi-net 6rd	33	48.3 Mbps
6.	Hetzner Online GmbH	48	33.6 Mbps
7.	Elisa Oyj	465	33.0 Mbps
8.	Empor Oy	33	14.8 Mbps
9.	Ficolo Oy	23	11.9 Mbps
10.	Creanova	172	3.6 Mbps
11.	Oy Multi.fi Finland Ab Ltd	15	1.8 Mbps
12.	CJSC «ER-Telecom Holding» Yoshkar-Ola branch	67	0.0 Mbps
13.	Choopa	14	0.0 Mbps
14.	Lounea Oy	26	0.0 Mbps

IPv6 in Belgium

These graphs show the evolution of default protocol, v6 address types, and average bandwidth in Belgium over time.

They are generated using the data collected by the ipv6-test.com connection test page, and are updated on a monthly basis.

Overall IPv6 and v4 protocol support in Belgium

This graph shows the evolution of IPv6 support vs IPv4 for all our connection test.

The numbers are percentages, so we can expect almost 100% of hosts supporting IPv4 with a slow growth for IPv6.

Top 25 internet service providers for IPv6 in Belgium (Jul 2019)

	ISP	IPv6 tests count
1.	Telenet BVBA	507
2.	Voo	325
3.	Edpnet	140
4.	Belgacom	131
5.	M247 Ltd	61
6.	Dcstar	57
7.	Vos Steve Sofie	48
8.	DCoostkamp colo	42
9.	Kuleuven	28
10.	Hurricane Electric LLC	13
11.	Cedric Rossius	11
12.	Telenet	7

IPv6 and v4 protocol support in Belgium (unique addresses)

This graph shows the evolution of IPv6 support vs IPv4 for unique users of our connection test.

The numbers are percentages, so we can expect a slow growth towards 50% v4 / 50% v6.

Top 25 internet service providers for IPv6 in Belgium (unique addresses, Jul 2019)

	ISP	Unique IPv6 addresses
1.	Telenet BVBA	267
2.	Voo	159
3.	Belgacom	92
4.	Edpnet	36
5.	M247 Ltd	8
6.	Hurricane Electric LLC	6
7.	Telenet	6
8.	Cedric Rossius	6
9.	Kuleuven	4
10.	DCoostkamp colo	1
11.	Dcstar	1
12.	Vos Steve Sofie	1

Default browser protocol in Belgium

This graph shows the percentage of browsers that default to IPv6 vs. IPv4 when visiting the ipv6-test connection test.

Hopefully, in the not so distant future, the v6 part will grow taller than the v4 one.

Default browser protocol in Belgium (dual-stack users)

This graph shows the percentage of browsers that default to IPv6 vs. IPv4 for users that have both v4 and v6 connectivity.

Usually a system will default to v6 when it’s available, but in some cases with tunneled connections, v4 stays the default.

Top 25 internet service providers for IPv6 default in Belgium (Jul 2019)

	ISP	Test count	IPv4	IPv4 %	IPv6	IPv6 %
1.	Dcstar	57	0.0%	57	100.0%
2.	Vos Steve Sofie	48	0.0%	48	100.0%
3.	Cedric Rossius	11	0.0%	11	100.0%
4.	Voo	325	14	4.3%	311	95.7%
5.	Hurricane Electric LLC	13	1	7.7%	12	92.3%
6.	Belgacom	131	13	9.9%	118	90.1%
7.	Telenet BVBA	507	60	11.8%	447	88.2%
8.	Edpnet	140	27	19.3%	113	80.7%
9.	M247 Ltd	61	13	21.3%	48	78.7%
10.	Kuleuven	28	9	32.1%	19	67.9%
11.	Telenet	7	4	57.1%	3	42.9%
12.	DCoostkamp colo	42	42	100.0%	0.0%

IPv6 address types in Belgium

Here you can see the evolution of address types over time, and measure usage of 6to4 and Teredo tunneled connectivity.

It should be noted that because 6rd works with native addresses, it cannot be detected here as tunneled. This is also the case with VPN based tunnels.

Downstream bandwidth in Belgium

This graph illustrates the connection speed gap between IPv4 and IPv6, numbers represent v6 speed as percentage of v4 speed.

The lower IPv6 speeds are often caused by tunneling overhead or insufficient v6 connectivity or peering capacity at ISPs.

Top 25 internet service providers for IPv6 speed in Belgium (Jul 2019)

	ISP	Test count	IPv6 average
1.	Telenet	7	127.4 Mbps
2.	Voo	325	82.4 Mbps
3.	Telenet BVBA	507	77.6 Mbps
4.	Edpnet	140	57.2 Mbps
5.	Belgacom	131	50.9 Mbps
6.	M247 Ltd	61	22.5 Mbps
7.	DCoostkamp colo	42	0.0 Mbps
8.	Dcstar	57	0.0 Mbps
9.	Vos Steve Sofie	48	0.0 Mbps
10.	Hurricane Electric LLC	13	0.0 Mbps
11.	Kuleuven	28	0.0 Mbps
12.	Cedric Rossius	11	0.0 Mbps

IPv6 in Taiwan

These graphs show the evolution of default protocol, v6 address types, and average bandwidth in Taiwan over time.

They are generated using the data collected by the ipv6-test.com connection test page, and are updated on a monthly basis.

Overall IPv6 and v4 protocol support in Taiwan

This graph shows the evolution of IPv6 support vs IPv4 for all our connection test.

The numbers are percentages, so we can expect almost 100% of hosts supporting IPv4 with a slow growth for IPv6.

Top 25 internet service providers for IPv6 in Taiwan (Jul 2019)

	ISP	IPv6 tests count
1.	Hinet Twnic	2,908
2.	Fetnet	268
3.	Taiwanmobile	124
4.	Tanet-twnic	75
5.	ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH	49
6.	Etwebs-twnic	36
7.	Tbcnet	18
8.	Hurricane Electric LLC	10
9.	Elanet	9
10.	Gsn-twnic	9
11.	Google LLC	6

IPv6 and v4 protocol support in Taiwan (unique addresses)

This graph shows the evolution of IPv6 support vs IPv4 for unique users of our connection test.

The numbers are percentages, so we can expect a slow growth towards 50% v4 / 50% v6.

Top 25 internet service providers for IPv6 in Taiwan (unique addresses, Jul 2019)

	ISP	Unique IPv6 addresses
1.	Hinet Twnic	1,769
2.	Fetnet	180
3.	Taiwanmobile	93
4.	Tanet-twnic	41
5.	Etwebs-twnic	21
6.	Tbcnet	10
7.	Hurricane Electric LLC	9
8.	Elanet	9
9.	Google LLC	5
10.	Gsn-twnic	4
11.	ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH	1

Default browser protocol in Taiwan

This graph shows the percentage of browsers that default to IPv6 vs. IPv4 when visiting the ipv6-test connection test.

Hopefully, in the not so distant future, the v6 part will grow taller than the v4 one.

Default browser protocol in Taiwan (dual-stack users)

This graph shows the percentage of browsers that default to IPv6 vs. IPv4 for users that have both v4 and v6 connectivity.

Usually a system will default to v6 when it’s available, but in some cases with tunneled connections, v4 stays the default.

Top 25 internet service providers for IPv6 default in Taiwan (Jul 2019)

	ISP	Test count	IPv4	IPv4 %	IPv6	IPv6 %
1.	Google LLC	6	0.0%	6	100.0%
2.	ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH	49	0.0%	49	100.0%
3.	Gsn-twnic	9	0.0%	9	100.0%
4.	Taiwanmobile	124	8	6.5%	116	93.5%
5.	Fetnet	268	24	9.0%	244	91.0%
6.	Hurricane Electric LLC	10	1	10.0%	9	90.0%
7.	Tbcnet	18	2	11.1%	16	88.9%
8.	Hinet Twnic	2,908	397	13.7%	2,511	86.3%
9.	Etwebs-twnic	36	8	22.2%	28	77.8%
10.	Tanet-twnic	75	25	33.3%	50	66.7%
11.	Elanet	9	9	100.0%	0.0%

IPv6 address types in Taiwan

Here you can see the evolution of address types over time, and measure usage of 6to4 and Teredo tunneled connectivity.

It should be noted that because 6rd works with native addresses, it cannot be detected here as tunneled. This is also the case with VPN based tunnels.

Downstream bandwidth in Taiwan

This graph illustrates the connection speed gap between IPv4 and IPv6, numbers represent v6 speed as percentage of v4 speed.

The lower IPv6 speeds are often caused by tunneling overhead or insufficient v6 connectivity or peering capacity at ISPs.

Top 25 internet service providers for IPv6 speed in Taiwan (Jul 2019)

	ISP	Test count	IPv6 average
1.	Tbcnet	18	54.4 Mbps
2.	Hinet Twnic	2,908	19.8 Mbps
3.	Tanet-twnic	75	19.3 Mbps
4.	Fetnet	268	13.4 Mbps
5.	Etwebs-twnic	36	13.3 Mbps
6.	Taiwanmobile	124	8.4 Mbps
7.	Hurricane Electric LLC	10	0.0 Mbps
8.	Google LLC	6	0.0 Mbps
9.	Elanet	9	0.0 Mbps
10.	ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH	49	0.0 Mbps
11.	Gsn-twnic	9	0.0 Mbps

IPv6 in Sweden

These graphs show the evolution of default protocol, v6 address types, and average bandwidth in Sweden over time.

They are generated using the data collected by the ipv6-test.com connection test page, and are updated on a monthly basis.

Overall IPv6 and v4 protocol support in Sweden

This graph shows the evolution of IPv6 support vs IPv4 for all our connection test.

The numbers are percentages, so we can expect almost 100% of hosts supporting IPv4 with a slow growth for IPv6.

Top 25 internet service providers for IPv6 in Sweden (Jul 2019)

	ISP	IPv6 tests count
1.	Hurricane Electric LLC	761
2.	31173 Services AB	150
3.	HERN Labs AB	121
4.	Telianet	53
5.	GleSYS Internet Services AB	52
6.	PrivActuallyV6	33
7.	Tele2	30
8.	Stockholms Stadsnat AB	27
9.	Bahnhof	26
10.	City Network Hosting AB	25
11.	Obenetwork Network	23
12.	Ovpn	23
13.	Telia Company AB	17
14.	Dfri	15
15.	Bredband2 AB	15
16.	Hi3g	15
17.	Comhem	10
18.	Gavle Energi AB	8
19.	Bredband2	7
20.	Fiber Direkt i Sverige AB	5

IPv6 and v4 protocol support in Sweden (unique addresses)

This graph shows the evolution of IPv6 support vs IPv4 for unique users of our connection test.

The numbers are percentages, so we can expect a slow growth towards 50% v4 / 50% v6.

Top 25 internet service providers for IPv6 in Sweden (unique addresses, Jul 2019)

	ISP	Unique IPv6 addresses
1.	Hurricane Electric LLC	293
2.	HERN Labs AB	85
3.	Telianet	31
4.	PrivActuallyV6	25
5.	Tele2	24
6.	Bahnhof	20
7.	31173 Services AB	19
8.	Ovpn	16
9.	Obenetwork Network	15
10.	Stockholms Stadsnat AB	10
11.	Hi3g	9
12.	Comhem	9
13.	Bredband2 AB	7
14.	Gavle Energi AB	5
15.	Dfri	4
16.	Bredband2	3
17.	City Network Hosting AB	3
18.	Telia Company AB	3
19.	Fiber Direkt i Sverige AB	3
20.	GleSYS Internet Services AB	2

Default browser protocol in Sweden

This graph shows the percentage of browsers that default to IPv6 vs. IPv4 when visiting the ipv6-test connection test.

Hopefully, in the not so distant future, the v6 part will grow taller than the v4 one.

Default browser protocol in Sweden (dual-stack users)

This graph shows the percentage of browsers that default to IPv6 vs. IPv4 for users that have both v4 and v6 connectivity.

Usually a system will default to v6 when it’s available, but in some cases with tunneled connections, v4 stays the default.

Top 25 internet service providers for IPv6 default in Sweden (Jul 2019)

	ISP	Test count	IPv4	IPv4 %	IPv6	IPv6 %
1.	Ovpn	23	0.0%	23	100.0%
2.	GleSYS Internet Services AB	52	0.0%	52	100.0%
3.	Tele2	30	0.0%	30	100.0%
4.	Gavle Energi AB	8	0.0%	8	100.0%
5.	PrivActuallyV6	33	0.0%	33	100.0%
6.	Obenetwork Network	23	0.0%	23	100.0%
7.	Bahnhof	26	2	7.7%	24	92.3%
8.	Telianet	53	7	13.2%	46	86.8%
9.	Hi3g	15	2	13.3%	13	86.7%
10.	Hurricane Electric LLC	761	103	13.5%	658	86.5%
11.	HERN Labs AB	121	20	16.5%	101	83.5%
12.	Comhem	10	2	20.0%	8	80.0%
13.	Stockholms Stadsnat AB	27	6	22.2%	21	77.8%
14.	Fiber Direkt i Sverige AB	5	2	40.0%	3	60.0%
15.	Dfri	15	8	53.3%	7	46.7%
16.	City Network Hosting AB	25	17	68.0%	8	32.0%
17.	Bredband2	7	5	71.4%	2	28.6%
18.	31173 Services AB	150	143	95.3%	7	4.7%
19.	Telia Company AB	17	17	100.0%	0.0%
20.	Bredband2 AB	15	15	100.0%	0.0%

IPv6 address types in Sweden

Here you can see the evolution of address types over time, and measure usage of 6to4 and Teredo tunneled connectivity.

It should be noted that because 6rd works with native addresses, it cannot be detected here as tunneled. This is also the case with VPN based tunnels.

Downstream bandwidth in Sweden

This graph illustrates the connection speed gap between IPv4 and IPv6, numbers represent v6 speed as percentage of v4 speed.

The lower IPv6 speeds are often caused by tunneling overhead or insufficient v6 connectivity or peering capacity at ISPs.

Top 25 internet service providers for IPv6 speed in Sweden (Jul 2019)

	ISP	Test count	IPv6 average
1.	Fiber Direkt i Sverige AB	5	138.2 Mbps
2.	Bahnhof	26	80.2 Mbps
3.	Stockholms Stadsnat AB	27	75.3 Mbps
4.	Comhem	10	74.3 Mbps
5.	Telianet	53	57.6 Mbps
6.	Obenetwork Network	23	53.4 Mbps
7.	Hurricane Electric LLC	761	41.2 Mbps
8.	Bredband2	7	34.2 Mbps
9.	Ovpn	23	34.0 Mbps
10.	Bredband2 AB	15	28.8 Mbps
11.	HERN Labs AB	121	7.5 Mbps
12.	Telia Company AB	17	6.8 Mbps
13.	Dfri	15	6.1 Mbps
14.	City Network Hosting AB	25	4.0 Mbps
15.	Tele2	30	2.2 Mbps
16.	31173 Services AB	150	0.2 Mbps
17.	Gavle Energi AB	8	0.0 Mbps
18.	GleSYS Internet Services AB	52	0.0 Mbps
19.	PrivActuallyV6	33	0.0 Mbps
20.	Hi3g	15	0.0 Mbps

IPv6 in Indonesia

These graphs show the evolution of default protocol, v6 address types, and average bandwidth in Indonesia over time.

They are generated using the data collected by the ipv6-test.com connection test page, and are updated on a monthly basis.

Overall IPv6 and v4 protocol support in Indonesia

This graph shows the evolution of IPv6 support vs IPv4 for all our connection test.

The numbers are percentages, so we can expect almost 100% of hosts supporting IPv4 with a slow growth for IPv6.

Top 25 internet service providers for IPv6 in Indonesia (Jul 2019)

	ISP	IPv6 tests count
1.	Hurricane Electric LLC	59
2.	PT Qwords Company International	51
3.	Tlkm BB Broadband Cust NAS	38
4.	Axarva Media Teknologi	19
5.	Chinanet	8

IPv6 and v4 protocol support in Indonesia (unique addresses)

This graph shows the evolution of IPv6 support vs IPv4 for unique users of our connection test.

The numbers are percentages, so we can expect a slow growth towards 50% v4 / 50% v6.

Top 25 internet service providers for IPv6 in Indonesia (unique addresses, Jul 2019)

	ISP	Unique IPv6 addresses
1.	Hurricane Electric LLC	28
2.	Tlkm BB Broadband Cust NAS	27
3.	Axarva Media Teknologi	9
4.	Chinanet	7
5.	PT Qwords Company International	1

Default browser protocol in Indonesia

This graph shows the percentage of browsers that default to IPv6 vs. IPv4 when visiting the ipv6-test connection test.

Hopefully, in the not so distant future, the v6 part will grow taller than the v4 one.

Default browser protocol in Indonesia (dual-stack users)

This graph shows the percentage of browsers that default to IPv6 vs. IPv4 for users that have both v4 and v6 connectivity.

Usually a system will default to v6 when it’s available, but in some cases with tunneled connections, v4 stays the default.

Top 25 internet service providers for IPv6 default in Indonesia (Jul 2019)

	ISP	Test count	IPv4	IPv4 %	IPv6	IPv6 %
1.	Axarva Media Teknologi	19	0.0%	19	100.0%
2.	Hurricane Electric LLC	59	6	10.2%	53	89.8%
3.	Tlkm BB Broadband Cust NAS	38	10	26.3%	28	73.7%
4.	Chinanet	8	3	37.5%	5	62.5%
5.	PT Qwords Company International	51	51	100.0%	0.0%

IPv6 address types in Indonesia

Here you can see the evolution of address types over time, and measure usage of 6to4 and Teredo tunneled connectivity.

It should be noted that because 6rd works with native addresses, it cannot be detected here as tunneled. This is also the case with VPN based tunnels.

Downstream bandwidth in Indonesia

This graph illustrates the connection speed gap between IPv4 and IPv6, numbers represent v6 speed as percentage of v4 speed.

The lower IPv6 speeds are often caused by tunneling overhead or insufficient v6 connectivity or peering capacity at ISPs.

Top 25 internet service providers for IPv6 speed in Indonesia (Jul 2019)

	ISP	Test count	IPv6 average
1.	Chinanet	8	8.9 Mbps
2.	Tlkm BB Broadband Cust NAS	38	3.6 Mbps
3.	Hurricane Electric LLC	59	2.6 Mbps
4.	PT Qwords Company International	51	0.0 Mbps
5.	Axarva Media Teknologi	19	0.0 Mbps

URLs

Full URLS shown below have both A and AAAA records.
The IPv4 and IPv6 only alternatives have only A and AAAA records respectively.
They can be used for testing connectivity over a particular protocol.
Note that not all of the IPv6 addresses are expected to answer.

URL	Description
http://ipv6-test.cns.vt.edu/ (IPv6 only) (IP only)	Normal site with both IP and IPv6. The default config in most cases it to connect with IPv6 if it is available. If you have IPv6 and that doesn’t happen, check your browser settings (network.dns.disableIPv6 in Firefox) and OS configuration.
http://ipv6-test-nolisten6.cns.vt.edu:9080/ (IPv6 only) (IP only)	Service listening only on IP address. IPv6 port is open in firewall and should send TCP RST. This is what happens if there is a server that does not listen on IPv6. Clients should fall back to IPv4 immediately.
http://ipv6-test-nohost6.cns.vt.edu/ (IPv6 only) (IP only)	IPv6 host that does not exist on a valid subnet.
http://ipv6-test-nosubnet6.cns.vt.edu/ (IPv6 only) (IP only)	IPv6 subnet that does not exist on our network.
http://ipv6-test-iwf6.cns.vt.edu:9081/ (IPv6 only) (IP only)	Service listening on IP only, IPv6 port silently drops TCP SYN.

# iptables --list | grep 908
ACCEPT     tcp  --  anywhere             anywhere            tcp dpt:9080
ACCEPT     tcp  --  anywhere             anywhere            tcp dpt:9081

locust:/usr/local/etc
# ip6tables --list | grep 908
ACCEPT     tcp      anywhere             anywhere           tcp dpt:9080
# 9081 is closed

#
# Apache
#
# NameVirtualHost is expected to be Yes
# UseCanonicalName is expected to be No
# 

    ServerAdmin ipv6-support@cns.vt.edu
    ServerName ipv6-test.cns.vt.edu
    #ServerAlias www.dummy-host.example.com
    #ErrorLog logs/dummy-host.example.com-error_log
    #CustomLog logs/dummy-host.example.com-access_log common

    # Bind only to v4 address.
    # V6 port should be open and send RST.
    ServerAdmin ipv6-support@cns.vt.edu
    ServerName ipv6-test-nolisten.cns.vt.edu

    # Bind only to v4 address.
    # V6 address not on any host but on this subnet
    ServerAdmin ipv6-support@cns.vt.edu
    ServerName ipv6-test-nohost6.cns.vt.edu

    # Bind only to v4 address.
    # V6 address on a subnet that does not exist
    ServerAdmin ipv6-support@cns.vt.edu
    ServerName ipv6-test-nosubnet6.cns.vt.edu

    # Bind only to v4 address.
    # V6 address blocked by firewall.
    ServerAdmin ipv6-support@cns.vt.edu
    ServerName ipv6-test-iwf6.cns.vt.edu

ipv6-support@cns.vt.edu

IPv6 in France

These graphs show the evolution of default protocol, v6 address types, and average bandwidth in France over time.

They are generated using the data collected by the ipv6-test.com connection test page, and are updated on a monthly basis.

Overall IPv6 and v4 protocol support in France

This graph shows the evolution of IPv6 support vs IPv4 for all our connection test.

The numbers are percentages, so we can expect almost 100% of hosts supporting IPv4 with a slow growth for IPv6.

Top 25 internet service providers for IPv6 in France (Jul 2019)

	ISP	IPv6 tests count
1.	ProXad network / Free	1,245
2.	Orange S.A.	1,224
3.	Bouygues Telecom ISP Wireline	918
4.	Hurricane Electric LLC	316
5.	Ovh	223
6.	Sfr	213
7.	Online S.A.S.	201
8.	Ovh Sas	103
9.	Bouygtel-isp	81
10.	Free SAS	77
11.	Knet	55
12.	M247 Ltd	55
13.	Ikoula Ripe	51
14.	Brenac Eurl	34
15.	Anexia	29
16.	Tetaneutral.net	28
17.	Contina	20
18.	DSP Herault Telecom	20
19.	Choopa	19
20.	Optilian	14
21.	Gitoyen Network	13
22.	Orange Slovensko a.s.	11
23.	Lab06 Ltd	7
24.	Level 3 Communications	7
25.	SHPV Infrastructure	7

IPv6 and v4 protocol support in France (unique addresses)

This graph shows the evolution of IPv6 support vs IPv4 for unique users of our connection test.

The numbers are percentages, so we can expect a slow growth towards 50% v4 / 50% v6.

Top 25 internet service providers for IPv6 in France (unique addresses, Jul 2019)

	ISP	Unique IPv6 addresses
1.	ProXad network / Free	749
2.	Bouygues Telecom ISP Wireline	701
3.	Orange S.A.	637
4.	Sfr	124
5.	Hurricane Electric LLC	108
6.	Bouygtel-isp	65
7.	Ovh	54
8.	Online S.A.S.	53
9.	Ovh Sas	47
10.	Free SAS	45
11.	Knet	17
12.	Optilian	14
13.	Brenac Eurl	12
14.	Choopa	8
15.	Orange Slovensko a.s.	8
16.	M247 Ltd	7
17.	Tetaneutral.net	6
18.	Gitoyen Network	6
19.	DSP Herault Telecom	4
20.	Renater	4
21.	Belgacom	3
22.	Level 3 Communications	3
23.	Contina	3
24.	Lab06 Ltd	2
25.	DSP Medialys	2

Default browser protocol in France

This graph shows the percentage of browsers that default to IPv6 vs. IPv4 when visiting the ipv6-test connection test.

Hopefully, in the not so distant future, the v6 part will grow taller than the v4 one.

Default browser protocol in France (dual-stack users)

This graph shows the percentage of browsers that default to IPv6 vs. IPv4 for users that have both v4 and v6 connectivity.

Usually a system will default to v6 when it’s available, but in some cases with tunneled connections, v4 stays the default.

Top 25 internet service providers for IPv6 default in France (Jul 2019)

	ISP	Test count	IPv4	IPv4 %	IPv6	IPv6 %
1.	DSP Medialys	5	0.0%	5	100.0%
2.	Belgacom	6	0.0%	6	100.0%
3.	Orange Slovensko a.s.	11	0.0%	11	100.0%
4.	Ikoula Ripe	51	0.0%	51	100.0%
5.	Optilian	14	0.0%	14	100.0%
6.	Anexia	29	0.0%	29	100.0%
7.	Bouygtel-isp	81	3	3.7%	78	96.3%
8.	DSP Herault Telecom	20	1	5.0%	19	95.0%
9.	Gitoyen Network	13	1	7.7%	12	92.3%
10.	Bouygues Telecom ISP Wireline	918	75	8.2%	843	91.8%
11.	Orange S.A.	1,224	110	9.0%	1,114	91.0%
12.	Sfr	213	22	10.3%	191	89.7%
13.	Choopa	19	2	10.5%	17	89.5%
14.	Free SAS	77	10	13.0%	67	87.0%
15.	Level 3 Communications	7	1	14.3%	6	85.7%
16.	Knet	55	9	16.4%	46	83.6%
17.	ProXad network / Free	1,245	221	17.8%	1,024	82.2%
18.	Contina	20	4	20.0%	16	80.0%
19.	Brenac Eurl	34	7	20.6%	27	79.4%
20.	Hurricane Electric LLC	316	85	26.9%	231	73.1%
21.	Ovh Sas	103	36	35.0%	67	65.0%
22.	Ovh	223	80	35.9%	143	64.1%
23.	Online S.A.S.	201	74	36.8%	127	63.2%
24.	M247 Ltd	55	22	40.0%	33	60.0%
25.	Lab06 Ltd	7	3	42.9%	4	57.1%

IPv6 address types in France

Here you can see the evolution of address types over time, and measure usage of 6to4 and Teredo tunneled connectivity.

It should be noted that because 6rd works with native addresses, it cannot be detected here as tunneled. This is also the case with VPN based tunnels.

Downstream bandwidth in France

This graph illustrates the connection speed gap between IPv4 and IPv6, numbers represent v6 speed as percentage of v4 speed.

The lower IPv6 speeds are often caused by tunneling overhead or insufficient v6 connectivity or peering capacity at ISPs.

Top 25 internet service providers for IPv6 speed in France (Jul 2019)

	ISP	Test count	IPv6 average
1.	Free SAS	77	237.4 Mbps
2.	Knet	55	223.0 Mbps
3.	Orange S.A.	1,224	139.2 Mbps
4.	Hurricane Electric LLC	316	124.0 Mbps
5.	ProXad network / Free	1,245	92.8 Mbps
6.	Sfr	213	87.7 Mbps
7.	Renater	6	57.0 Mbps
8.	M247 Ltd	55	34.7 Mbps
9.	Bouygtel-isp	81	33.7 Mbps
10.	Orange Slovensko a.s.	11	27.9 Mbps
11.	Ovh	223	26.8 Mbps
12.	Online S.A.S.	201	16.7 Mbps
13.	Tetaneutral.net	28	15.7 Mbps
14.	Bouygues Telecom ISP Wireline	918	9.9 Mbps
15.	DSP Herault Telecom	20	8.6 Mbps
16.	DSP Medialys	5	4.1 Mbps
17.	Ovh Sas	103	3.5 Mbps
18.	Gitoyen Network	13	2.3 Mbps
19.	Brenac Eurl	34	0.0 Mbps
20.	Lab06 Ltd	7	0.0 Mbps
21.	SHPV Infrastructure	7	0.0 Mbps
22.	Anexia	29	0.0 Mbps
23.	Belgacom	6	0.0 Mbps
24.	Choopa	19	0.0 Mbps
25.	Optilian	14	0.0 Mbps